Movies Watched -- The Raid: Redemption (2011)

Added on by C. Maoxian.

101 minute running time … has someone hacked John Farr’s website and injected these terrible recommendations? (Oh it looks like Farr may have a crush on Iko Uwais.) This is an action / kung fu / ultraviolent movie from Indonesia of all places … sure, the action and fight scenes are impressive, but I tire so quickly of this stuff and can’t get through it fast enough at 8x fast forward. I’m too old now (testosterone levels at zero) so I just don’t care … give it a miss if you’re another fifty year old white guy.

Grimacing after falling five stories

Grimacing after falling five stories

Movies Watched -- Never Rarely Sometimes Always (2020)

Added on by C. Maoxian.

101 minute running time … men don’t come across well in this one, they’re all predators or assholes or perverts masturbating at you on the subway, or slobbering over your outstretched hand, etc. … this was well made though and the lead actress was really good, the scene of intrusive (and revelatory) questioning that I’ve screencapped below was powerful stuff, she really knocked it out of the park there. Tough to watch, but necessary. Thanks to John Farr for the recommendation.

It’s a teenage pregnancy / abortion story … how a poor white girl from rural Pennsylvania deals with it … could she really not have turned to her mom for help? Or some other supportive adult, including a man, even a … dare I say it, dad? And what of the baby’s father? Sad and disturbing. It’s also about friendship and loyalty and teen girls toughing things out together. Money, class, sexual abuse, bureaucracy … heavy stuff, not light entertainment. It’s cleverly made propaganda of sorts which all teenage girls (and boys) should see for a scare. This gets a green-go.

Dick Brody called it “stark and harrowing,” which is surely is. Justin Chang writes, “what makes the movie so forceful is its quality of understatement, its determination to build its argument not didactically but cinematically.“ I found it pretty didactic, but… it is still good.

Also love Armond White’s take on it

“I want to make sure you’re safe.”

“I want to make sure you’re safe.”


Movies Watched -- War of the Arrows (2011)

Added on by C. Maoxian.

122 minute running time so at least 30 minutes too long … John Farr did me dirty once again but recommending a clinker, though he’s right about it being “relentless” … Korean period war drama with more than a dozen cuts a minute for the length of the movie which was totally exhausting … bad action movies and good video games indistinguishable now. You can give it a miss.

It’s all in the elbow

It’s all in the elbow

Movies Watched -- Bastards (2013)

Added on by C. Maoxian.

101 minute running time … this was terrible … the only good thing about it was seeing the very handsome Chiara Mastroianni (Marcello, her dad, and Catherine Deneuve, her mother) but that was it … DUMB story with a really SORDID ending, just awful. Why do people like John Farr love Claire Denis so much? It wasn’t even well edited, just a mess. “Moody neo-noir,“ no, “dark thriller,“ no, “riveting tale of perversion and vengeance,“ no and no, it’s just shit.

Xan Brooks gets it: “I had the sense that Denis's painstaking approach was little more than an act of concealment; that her actual story was thin and tacky and that her elaborate style was precisely that.“

Girls look like Dad

Girls look like Dad

Story of $GEVO in Six Time-stamped Tweets

Added on by C. Maoxian.

Movies Watched -- Bullhead (2011)

Added on by C. Maoxian.

124 minute running time so at least 30 minutes too long … I have no idea what John Farr was thinking when he recommended this one … Belgian farmers, cop killing, steroid smuggling, an act of child-on-child violence so horrific I couldn’t even look. Farr right to say that it’s brutal and disturbing, wrong to say it’s unforgettable. You can give it a miss.

Et tu, Bruno?

Et tu, Bruno?

Movies Watched -- Once Upon a Time in Anatolia (2011)

Added on by C. Maoxian.

157 minute running time, which I’d normally say is an hour too long, but I loved this movie so it gets a pass. This was even better than The Wild Pear Tree, which led me to this movie (same director). This is a deep movie, very cerebral, 99.99% of the viewing public couldn’t possibly sit through it. It’s a movie only for special people like me and … you?

SPOILERS: Let me explain the ending. The doctor, who represented science and logic and rationality, did not include the fact that the murder victim had been buried alive in the autopsy report because he wanted to spare the child, the murderer’s son, the full truth about his father’s crime. It was horrible enough as it was and didn’t need the added indignity that he had buried a man alive. After a long night and many conversations, he understood that it’s sometimes better to hide the truth. It’s the children who suffer most from their parents’ crimes. People of the present suffer the sins committed by those in the past. Who writes history?

The fleck of blood on the doctor’s cheek represents his being sullied, being stained … he’s human now and making choices which humans make, for good or ill. The last line is: “Doctor, step back a bit, or you’ll get stuff on you.” Too late for that!

The screencap below is of the village mayor’s beautiful teenage daughter who serves them tea and causes each man to stop in wonder and astonishment … it’s a religious moment … she’s like a vision and in fact moves the murderer to hallucinate that his victim is there among them and makes him weep and shortly after confess more details about the crime.

It’s a great, great movie.

The beautiful usually have a bad fortune, doctor.

The beautiful usually have a bad fortune, doctor.

An Ethnically Bipolar State

Added on by C. Maoxian.

From Philip Gourevitch’s interview on Booknotes:

“Hutu and Tutsi, although they're called ethnic groups or tribes or races, they--nobody knows exactly how they came into being as social categories in Rwanda. The difference is that, for our--the entire colonial period, a very strict concept of Tutsis as a superior race and Hutus as an inferior race, this elite minority of Tutsis who lorded it over them--the rest and who essentially harnessed their labor and exploited them as a monarchist class, they became privileged and an almost apartheid-like system was imposed by the Belgians, with identity cards defining your ethnicity.“

With the Wave of a Wand

Added on by C. Maoxian.

From Lani Guinier’s interview on Booknotes (sharp cookie, I like everything about her):

“I believe that no one is irredeemably anything, so the claim that white Americans are implacably hostile to black progress is not something that I believe. I certainly have seen parts of this country in which the majority, who is white, have refused to cooperate with the minority, who is black, and have done more than refuse to cooperate. They have deliberately excluded the minority. I had a case in Louisiana in which the black legislators were deliberately excluded from the key reapportionment meeting, and we put members of the Louisiana Senate, staff on the witness stand who, number one, admitted that they had deliberately not invited the black lawmakers, although everyone else who had an interest in the plan had been invited. And then they said the reason that they didn't invite the black lawmakers to this critical meeting is that they knew that they, the black legislators, would not like the outcome. So I have seen instances. People have been even more blatant in their language. In this same case, one of the white legislators was adamant that he did not want to see ‘another nigger big shot’ in Louisiana because ‘they already have one nigger mayor.’ Does he represent all people in Louisiana? No, but he represented a key player in this particular case, and because of his influence I believed race was a factor in the decision as to how to draw the lines in that particular congressional reapportionment.“