|
|
||||||
|
|
Monday, December 6
Simple SystemsWhen things go up and up and up, simple moving average crossover systems show good gains. Here's the SIRI 5-min. chart:
![]() SIRI, 5-min. Chart Looking out a little longer, here's the TZOO daily chart:
![]() TZOO, Daily Chart Posted on December 6, 2004 at 17:45, GMT
Stocks to Watch -- Monday, December 6
Posted on December 6, 2004 at 14:15, GMT
Chat Room Open from 8AM-9AM, Eastern TimeLast Friday in the morning chat we learned the Latin word for detergent, and were on top of BIOM from the get-go. Everyone's welcome, come on in. Posted on December 6, 2004 at 8:15, GMT
Chart of the Day -- China Aviation Oil (Singapore), Daily ChartTrading is currently suspended in these shares.
![]() China Aviation Oil (Singapore), Daily Chart Posted on December 6, 2004 at 7:55, GMT
Best and Worst Performing Large-Cap Stocks (last 52 weeks)Best:
Worst:
Posted on December 6, 2004 at 7:45, GMT
Yesterday's Media Vision, Today's OmniVision?Have investors learned nothing? by Herb "Perma-Skeptic" Greenberg:
"You can justify all kinds of valuations using all kinds of wacky metrics as long as stocks are going higher. It's funny how some of those methods of valuation
look so silly after the fact. Is it different this time? No -- just as it wasn't during the bubble. When the music stops you still need to find a chair.
It's remarkable so many investors still haven't learned that lesson. What's happening, after all, is so 1999. Except instead of Amazon, we have Overstock."
Posted on December 6, 2004 at 7:35, GMT
Misadventures in DerivativesFailed China Fuel Supplier Waited Too Long for Help, by Wayne Arnold:
"As the details behind China Aviation Singapore's collapse emerge, there appear to be three central questions its executives will face: Why didn't
the company's own risk management apparatus detect and then halt the trading losses earlier? Why didn't the parent company disclose the losses before
selling a 15 percent stake in its subsidiary in October? And why did the company still neglect to tell shareholders about the losses when it reported
quarterly earnings last month?"
This story just keeps on getting juicier. I'd love to know what the actual positions were that caused the losses. Did they sell naked puts on crude futures? I'm going to follow this story closely. Posted on December 6, 2004 at 7:25, GMT
Going Public on the Cusp of the DepressionCat marks 75 years of NYSE trading, by Paul Gordon:
"... the company now known as Caterpillar Inc. traded 400 shares on its first day [December 2, 1929], closing with a price of $56.25 a share, and continued to
grow from there, with an annual compounded growth rate of 7.65 percent a year ... According to the company, if somebody purchased one share of Caterpillar
stock on that day, it would be worth more than $14,000 today, taking the stock splits into account."
Continued to grow from there? I'm sure the share price collapsed throughout 1930, '31, '32 along with everything else, but even folks who bought that first day and hung in there have done all right -- the magic of compound interest at work. I wonder if that 7.65% annual compound growth rate includes dividends? It must. CAT was featured as Chart of the Day last Monday. Posted on December 6, 2004 at 7:15, GMT
Previous Entry >>> PDCO |
|
© 2000 - 2004
Chairman MaoXian |
|
||
|
|
||||||