|
|
||||||
|
|
Thursday, December 2
End of Day Update on Crude TradingFuzzy made another 230 cents in crude today. I have no idea how much of it he's going to hang on to in the end. I'd move the protective stop to breakeven, but that would make the Fuzzmeister heart sick... don't monkey with a good thing.
![]() Light Sweet Crude, 30-minute Chart Posted on December 2, 2004 at 21:35, GMT
Stocks to Watch -- Thursday, December 2
Posted on December 2, 2004 at 14:15, GMT
Chat Room Open from 8AM-9AM, Eastern TimeYesterday in the morning chat we had a heated debate about boxers versus briefs, concluded that neither the Marx Brothers nor the Three Stooges are the least bit funny, and, oh yeah, we were watching GORX from the get-go. Come join us today.... Posted on December 2, 2004 at 8:15, GMT
Chart of the Day -- Moody's and Dun & Bradstreet, Weekly Charts
Moody's Corporation is a provider of credit ratings, research and analysis covering debt instruments and securities in the global capital
markets and a provider of quantitative credit assessment services, credit training services and credit process software to banks and other financial institutions.
MCO hit a new all-time high yesterday, and DNB hit a new all-time high last week. Moody's completed its spin-off from Dun & Bradstreet (DNB) on September 30, 2000, and you can see from the charts that MCO has somewhat outperformed DNB since that time. Warren Buffett owns about a 15% of MCO. As Buffett knows well, investing in businesses that have little or no competition, like Moody's, is a no-brainer.
![]() MCO, DNB, Weekly Charts Posted on December 2, 2004 at 7:55, GMT
Best and Worst Performing ETFs (last 4 weeks)Best:
Worst:
Posted on December 2, 2004 at 7:45, GMT
Update on Crude TradingSmall losses, small gains, and the occasional big gain is the name of the game.
![]() Light Sweet Crude, 30-minute Chart Posted on December 2, 2004 at 7:35, GMT
The Fine Line Between Incompetence and MalfeasanceTrading Losses at Chinese Firm Coming to Light, by Keith Bradsher:
"The disclosure this week that a Singapore-listed company controlled by a Chinese state-owned enterprise lost $550 million in derivatives transactions [for fuel oil] in the last
five weeks has touched off an international scramble to determine who will cover the losses ... The heavy losses... have underlined three recurrent problems
with state-owned companies and their affiliates. The problems involve the companies' often poor level of financial sophistication, their weak corporate governance
and their uncertain financial backing from Beijing. Chinese copper companies were among the biggest losers when copper prices plunged in October, sustaining
several hundred million dollars in losses, government-controlled news media in China reported at the time. The Chinese news media blamed a lack of skill among
Chinese copper traders in hedging their bets for the losses, not malfeasance. It also blamed an excessive willingness to believe that an increase in prices over
the summer would continue."
The old "excessive willingness to believe" bugaboo. Posted on December 2, 2004 at 7:25, GMT
The Trend is Your FriendDo Hedge Funds Calm Markets or Inflate Bubbles? by Matthew Lynn:
"... hedge funds did not engage in a persistent attack on the technology bubble. In contrast, it seems that at least until late 1999,
their trading mostly supported rather than undermined the bubble. Hedge funds were riding the bubble, not fighting it. From an efficient
markets perspective, these results are puzzling. Why would some of the most sophisticated investors in the market hold these overpriced
technology stocks? And why would they devote a larger share of their portfolio to these stocks than other investors?"
From an efficient markets perspective, everything is puzzling. Posted on December 2, 2004 at 7:15, GMT
Previous Entry >>> POT |
|
© 2000 - 2004
Chairman MaoXian |
|
||
|
|
||||||